Food Logistics

SEP 2014

Food Logistics serves the entire food supply chain industry with targeted content for manufacturers, retailers, and distributors.

Issue link: https://foodlogistics.epubxp.com/i/387691

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 51

B Y M A R K M O N T A G U E COOL INSIGHTS W hen new federal hours of service (HOS) regulations took efect on July 1, 2013, the intent was to reduce fatal crashes on the high- way. Whether that's actually happening is another subject altogether, but there's little doubt that the rules have hin- dered productivity and led to higher rates for anyone who ships freight over the road. The most contentious rule change involves the 34-hour restart. Drivers are allowed to "restart" their 60- or 70-hour service clock after having at least 34 consecutive hours off duty. The rule now requires the restart period to include at least two off-duty periods from 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. (home-terminal time zone). Furthermore, the use of the restart is limited to once a week (once every 168 hours). These twists on the restart provision tend to put a disproportionate share of trucks on the road in major metro areas during morn- ing rush hours. Furthermore, drivers who are accustomed to working nights are forced to re-set their schedules during their off-duty hours, disrupting normal sleep patterns. Also, timing mandatory breaks can be tricky for long-haul drivers who are on tight timetables and may have trouble finding safe and legal parking spots at precise intervals. HOS and higher rates What has this meant for supply chains? A survey from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) found that 80 percent of carriers lost productivity due to the HOS changes, with 50 percent noting that they need more drivers to maintain the status quo in terms of freight-hauling capacity. ATRI analyzed 40,000-plus driver logbooks and concluded that the new rules result in a loss of 7.5 minutes to 30 minutes per week per driver. This equates to a cost of $95.06 million to $376.94 million per year, as well as a net loss of $1.6 billion in driver compensation. Carriers naturally want to recover these costs, and they're making gains. Charting our data at DAT, we can see how an HOS- induced productivity loss corresponded with increased rates. Let's go back to the third quarter of 2013, just after the new rules took effect. Instead of sharp Q3 decline, spot market van rates (the orange line) rose and remained elevated through the third quarter. At the end of Q4, these rates rose even further to a peak in March 2014 when severe weather constrained truck- load capacity. Rates reached a high again in June, when truckload freight volume on the spot market was up 50 percent compared to the previous year. In July, freight volume increased 40 percent for vans, 28 percent for reefers, and 52 percent for flatbeds year-over- year. The increased demand, together with capacity constraints, caused national average spot market truckload rates to rise year-over- year for all major equipment types: the van rate rose 15 percent, the refrigerated rate was up 6.3 percent, and the flatbed rate rose 15 percent compared to July 2013. Van rates follow closely behind trends in the load-to-truck ratio (purple line), an indi- cator of demand versus available spot-market capacity. For the month of August, the aver- age van load-to-truck ratio was 3.3, meaning there were 3.3 available loads for every avail- able van posted on DAT load boards. That's a 5.2 percent increase compared to July, and 25 percent above the level of August 2013. Now let's look at capacity and demand for refrigerated freight. The load-to-truck ratio for August was 10.1, a sharp 11 percent jump from July and 24 percent higher compared to August 2013. Typically, reefer load-to-truck ratios flatten out or rise slightly in August before making an autumn decline. At a nation- HOS Rules and Higher Rates al average of $2.28 per mile in August (includ- ing a fuel surcharge), spot rates remained strong for reefers through the summer, exceed- ing August 2013 averages by 9.1 percent. What next? In the short term, the Christmas freight season is not far off and consumer confidence is up, which means there will be "exception" freight — goods that aren't under contract — possibly lots of it. With demand increasing, and carriers and drivers having to keep a more watchful eye on the HOS clock, spot market rates have continued to rise. As a forecasting tool, spot market rate trends are a valid indicator of where contract rates will go. Anticipate an increase starting with the Q1 bidding season. Mark Montague is manager, industry rates, for DAT Solutions, which operates the DAT® network of load boards. As a mathematician and statistician, he has applied his expertise to logistics, rates and routing for more than 30 years, and was instrumental in developing DAT's RateView truckload rates and analysis product. He is based in Portland, Ore. For information, visit www.dat.com. ◆ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 15.2 13.2 11.2 9.2 7.2 5.2 Refrigerated Load-to-Truck Ratios 2012-2014 10.1 11.1 7.1 2012 2013 2014 Aug 11 Oct 11 Dec 11 Feb 12 Apr 12 Jun 12 Aug 12 Oct 12 Dec 12 Feb 13 Apr 13 Jun 13 Aug 13 Oct 13 Dec 13 Feb 14 Apr 14 Jun 14 Aug 14 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.10 $1.00 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Van Line Haul Rates & Load-to-Truck Ratio August 2011-2014 Van Line Haul Rate Van Load-to-Truck Ratio 20 SEPTEMBER 2014 • FOOD LOGISTICS www.foodlogistics.com © 2014 DAT Solutions

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Food Logistics - SEP 2014